The alarming power of unreason
SCMP Feb 7, 2006
There has been an alarming rise in the mix of politics and raw emotion stirred
by governments. Take, for example, the uproar in the Muslim world about cartoons
featuring the Prophet Mohammed which appeared in Denmark and were reprinted
in other European countries as editors sought to demonstrate that press freedom
must not be constrained by religious sensitivities.
As one who was in the Arab world when this erupted, it was clear
that governments and editorialists everywhere were jumping on the
bandwagon of emotion, calling
for boycotts of Danish products, apologies from the countries and action
against the perpetrators. These reactions seemed to typify the
and low levels of education which prevail in much of the Islamic world, notably
the Arab part of it which, despite oil wealth, now boasts the lowest literacy
rates of any region.
For sure, religion is a sensitive subject - but so is the freedom of
speech and the press in open and plural societies. In Muslim exclusivist
societies such as Saudi Arabia, it is understandable that making
fun of the Prophet is no more acceptable than making fun of Mao Zedong
was during the Cultural Revolution in China. But in Europe and North
America the spirit of Voltaire still, just about, lives - that you
may detest a person's opinions but defend to the death his right
to proclaim them.
The cartoons were deliberately provocative, offensive and in bad taste.
But most good cartoons offend. Are Muslims so sensitive that they cannot
abide being laughed at? The Prophet Mohammed was a man, not a god.
Christians in Europe are often outraged by "blasphemous" depictions
of Christ. If God is offended, so be it. But that's a judgment which
will have to wait.
The west has itself partly to blame for its problem over the cartoons.
There has been an erosion of freedom of speech and the press through
legislation allegedly designed to combat racism and terrorism. If you
can have a law against racist or sexist language, why not a law against
criticising another's religion? In the case of the cartoons, the offence
was to link the Prophet Mohammed to suicide bombers. But is it not
the bombers who have linked the Prophet to their cause? The cause may
seem, to many, to be a just fight against foreign occupation. But no
Muslim can deny that the bombings were in the name of God any more
than Christians can deny that they have launched holy wars, starting
with the crusades and, in the eyes of many, continuing to this day
Muslims may feel they suffer prejudice in the west (and elsewhere).
They may reasonably consider that on issues ranging from Iran's nuclear
programme to Israel's expansion they are victims of western imperialism.
They may reasonably see the hypocrisy of the west's demand for democracy
with reality. But reaction to the cartoons displays just the region's
obsession with symbols, the paucity of intellectual activity, the dominance
of assorted dictatorships in political life and the failure to learn
from Asian examples of economic and social development.
Unfortunately, it is not a unique example of the power of unreason.
China apparently dare not release the movie Memoirs of a Geisha for
fear of public reaction to a Chinese actress playing a Japanese. One
might have thought that if anyone was to be offended it would be the
Japanese. But this feared popular response to a movie is the flip side
of the crude nationalism unleashed by Beijing's persistent, politically-motivated
Japan-bashing. Having sowed the wind, the leadership now fears the
TOP OF THE PAGE